NCLT JUDGEMENT ON SECTION 164, 248, 252, 252(3) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013

NAME		MOBILE NO.	E-MAIL I’D
RANJEET KUMAR		8383098478, 9667769795	rk@courtkutchehry.com
JAI THAKUR		8130703334, 9355723300	jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com
RAJEEV RANJAN		9334553249	rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com
ASHOK MISHRA		9718327746	sales@courtkutchehry.com
RAVI KUMAR			ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com

Moh. Iqbal Hartford Academy Of Insurance And Anr Vs. Registrar Of Companies, (2020) 07 NCLT CK 0025

NCLT allowed the application filed by the applicant, under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the name of the struck off company. While allowing the appeal NCLT held that thus, from the contention raised by the Counsel for the Applicant it can be seen that the Applicant is relying on the "just ground" as envisaged under Section 252(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 to restore the name of the Company in the Register of Companies maintained by the RoC/Respondent. Apart from the said "just ground" relied on by the Applicant from the typed set of documents filed in the Application, it may be seen as rightly pointed out in the Report of the RoC/Respondent that the Company has not filed any Income Tax Returns for the period from 2003-2019 nor any GST Returns in order to show that the Company is a going concern. However, as already stated that the Applicant relies only upon the "just ground" as contemplated under the provisions of Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013.